Skip to main content

Johnny the Greatheart


The Angel that presided o’er my birth
Said, ‘Little creature, form’d of Joy and Mirth,
‘Go love without the help of any Thing on Earth.’
-William Blake

A very long time ago, I read an article (I think it was on Cracked?) deriding the absurdity of gambling with the Devil and his subsequent defeat at the hands of Johnny as told by Charlie Daniels in “The Devil Went Down to Georgia.” Why would the Devil ever, ever participate in a fair contest, let alone play to his mark’s strengths? Who is to determine the victor—wait, the Devil is?! The Devil Himself concedes to a hapless Georgian boy when the forfeiture of his very soul is at stake? He’s gone and played right into the Devil’s hand, offered up his soul for the prospect of gaudy material gain (a golden fiddle, ha), the Devil even summons demonic assistance...and then Johnny just outplays Him and His demon band. And then the Devil just...admits defeat. Really?

Yes. Yes, really.

Much more recently, I learned of the now-forgotten but once-almost-as-popular-as-the-Bible-itself novel, The Pilgrim’s Progress. The 17th century Christian allegory relates the journey of a man named Christian and his family along the figurative and literal, physical path toward salvation. It’s split into two parts. In the first half, we follow Christian. Spurred to pilgrimage by anguished awareness of the burden of his sins, Christian sets course for the Celestial City from his hometown, the City of Destruction, with his pliable friend, Pliable. He leaves his family behind; he is unable to persuade them to follow him.

This being a Christian allegory, of course Christian is beset on all sides by numerous manifestations of evil festering within the hearts of mankind: Braggarts, Thieves, Soothsayers, Ne’er-Do-Wells, Obstinate People, Pliable People, Corrupt Statesmen, Lusty Maidens, The Pope. Oh, and demons, too, lots of demons.

And this being a Christian allegory, of course Christian nearly falls into the clutches of all of these human-demons and demon-demons, only to be saved through steadfast faith and earnest prayer. Christian makes a lot of friends, and a lot of his friends die or otherwise fall off the King’s Highway. Utterly deprived of agency for the bulk his travels, he wins one over on the forces of evil by slaying Apollyon in the Valley of Humiliation—with the aid of a sword provided by Jesus himself, of course. It takes him over half a day to land the fatal blow. Christian eventually reaches the Celestial City alongside his newfound friend, Hopeful (Pliable died a long time ago).

In the second part, Christian’s family walks the same path. Greatheart serves as their guide.

Most of the members of the party are totally unfit for the journey ahead, by name: Feeble-Mind, Despondency, Much-Afraid, women and children. They all make it to the Celestial City.

How do they manage? Well, any time a demon, or giant, or whatever, impedes the pilgrims’ progress, Greatheart kills that evil thing, and then the party continues onward. Along the way, they meet other similarly inept pilgrims and bring them along for the ride. No one dies or quits. Why would they? Might as well be on a pleasant stroll.

The Pilgrim’s Progress has faded into obscurity, the second part especially so. You might presume it’s because it’s too Christian, but tell that to The Matrix, The Chronicles of Narnia, The Passion of the Christ, God’s Not Dead, God’s Not Dead 2, God’s Not Dead 3: A Light in Darkness, et. al. If anything, the second part is so un-Christian, it might as well be Pagan folklore. Where’s the suffering, the guilt, the temptation? This is an inclusive group who all arrive safely at the Celestial City. The unworthy get into heaven without addressing their faults. The meek and the weak make it, too, even if they would never be able to on their own.

What about Greatheart? Where’s his road to redemption? He bursts through the Wicker Gate brimming with righteous fury from the start. He’s not even on a pilgrimage—he’s a tour guide on the path to heaven. Greatheart doesn’t struggle. Greatheart conquers all. He never falters, hardly prays; Jesus never hands him a sword. Greatheart gets to go to heaven just the same. What’s more, he makes Christian’s semi-solo journey look kind of, well, dumb, in hindsight. Why didn’t he just wait for Greatheart to show up? Pliable would still be alive and well, at the very least.

If this is an allegory, and a previously very famous one at that, then we should be able to learn something from it, right? But working from the post-postmodern construct of reality and principles of narrative structure, the second part of The Pilgrim’s Progress seems so...non-sequitur.

Perhaps we’ve missed some prerequisite coursework necessary to learning this lesson. What have we forgotten?

Let’s start from the source of the confusion: Greatheart. His most revealing characteristic is that he’s special, but he’s not that special. He’s sent on a holy mission by divine forces, but he’s still just a man. Granted, Greatheart is the best among us, but he’s a mortal man nonetheless. And yet—and yet—he slays the demons and giants and monsters, ones who are just as demonic as his patron is divine, every single time. He protects the pilgrims every single time. He makes it look easy, and he makes it easy for the rest.

And yet, Greatheart is just a man. A great man, and a great-hearted man, but a man nonetheless.

This is where we get tripped up: We’ve lost our faith in the existence of men like Greatheart, and men like Greatheart have lost their place among us. Look around you. Who would you trust to guide Feeble-Mind and Much-Afraid to the Celestial City? Who should you wait for instead of heading out on your own? The correct answer is no one, and that is a terrible shame.

Superheroes are the very best we can muster in our wildest dreams, and they very well might be worse than no one at all. They have superpowers, but they still only prolong the inevitable on their best days, when they’re not preoccupied with their own problems. Greatheart is just a man, but he has no problems, and he sees his mission through to the very end; his pilgrims are saved, not just not-dead.

Sometimes, the hero must triumph over the forces of evil, and because he must, he will. That statement is, tautological, causal, not sentimental. It is so. Otherwise, only Christians get into heaven.

Who among us would be Greatheart? Whoever he is, he’s just a man, after all. Does he really have the gall, the nerve, to offer to defeat the forces of evil every single time, and then wield enough might to do so every single time? Does he really have the wherewithal to acknowledge his mortality and limitations and yet—and yet—recognize his capacities and the urgent need to bring them to bear, despite consensus to the contrary?

I mean, really, Johnny? Wagering your very soul in a fiddlin’ contest with the Devil Himself, and then winning? Really?

Yes. Yes, really. Because he must, so he will.

That’s how the song is written, anyway. Your version of the song would be awful, Mr. Much-Afraid, and so was your article.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Enemy

You may want to consider what you would do in a suicide crisis situation. Like all life-or-death situations in general, and violence-defensive situations in particular, it probably won’t happen to you, but preparation is time certainly well spent nonetheless. In the case of a suicide crisis, all of the lines of defense before you have fallen, and this person is on the verge of commiting the suicidal act. It is not your fault what happens to this person; it’ll never, ever be your fault. But if you take a moment to reflect now, you might notice that you’d do anything, anything to prevent that suicidal act from occurring. It is a moral imperative that is ingrained into human nature. So what do you do? Well, the first thing you do, provided it is a logistically feasible demand, is say, “Show me your face. Look me in the eyes.” This might take you by surprise--it’s a far cry from the orthodox “don’t do it, you have so much to live for, there are people who care about you” scri

Death by Algorithm

All that being said about upholding the sanctity of the historical narrative, let’s pull a direct example from history and use it to prove my point about politics. The Cold War crises which almost brought nuclear annihilation to us all and the means by which they were averted are offered by progressive thinkers as examples of free men rejecting authority to do what’s right. They broke the programming and saved us all. Reactionaries tend to avoid the topic entirely. After all, hierarchy is good, but it was the military hierarchy that almost pushed the button. This is not the hill to die on. But who wrote the programming? It wasn’t military doctrine that called for the blockades, or funded the construction and tearing down of missile batteries. No General dropped a dossier titled “Operation MAD” on the Commander in Chief’s desk. In the field of international relations, the whole idea is to pick a small set of premises, assume that they are inherently true all the time, and b

The Vape Ban: Render unto Caesar

I live in San Francisco. Some group of people here who apparently possess the legislative authority to do so decided to Ban Vape. This piece of legislation is known as the Vape Ban. Why? When does it go into effect? What are they banning—cartridges, the electric bit, all of it? Can people still buy them elsewhere and bring them back, or buy them online and have whatever’s banned shipped to their home? Is Juul still allowed to have their big, shiny vape-selling coordination mechanism known as a “Headquarters” downtown? I’m sure there are answers if you look into it. Another group of people apparently did look into it, and they decided it would be best to Repeal the Vape Ban, and to do this, they’ve took it upon themselves to recruit as much support in the effort as possible. The lynchpin of the whole operation is canvassing the entire city with their demands for a Repeal. Okay. How do we all help you with this? Is there a referendum or something? The Repeal is suppo